By Mike Scruggs- If American lives and the survival of freedom matter, then truth and realism must govern U.S. immigration policy on vetting all immigrants for entry into the United States. There is no higher responsibility of government than guarding the safety, security, and lawful enjoyment of peace and just order in society.
Proper vetting is extremely important for any class of immigrants, but we are dangerously blind to reality unless we acknowledge that the resurgence of militant Islam presents much higher immigration risks to national security and public safety than the U.S. has ever seen. As of July 27, there have been 28,907 Islamic terrorist attacks in the world since 9/11, killing more than 200,000 people. For the month of June 2016 alone, there were 238 terror attacks in 33 countries, killing 2,055 people. According to Dr. Bill Warner with the Center for the Study of Political Islam, 60 million Christians have been killed in the Middle East, Africa, and Europe during Islam’s 1400-year Jihad against all non-Muslims Turkish genocides from 1900 to 1923 killed between 3.5 and 4.3 million Christians. Just this week, Muslim terrorists took several people hostage in a French church and slit the throat of an 84-year-old priest. Nobody outside of a political madhouse should still believe the Muslim Brotherhood propaganda that Islam is a religion of peace. Extraordinarily careful vetting of Muslim immigrants is absolutely necessary. Otherwise, thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of lives will be jeopardized.
Islam’s important Doctrine of Islamic Supremacy suggests extreme caution in granting residence to Muslim immigrants. Here is one of the Hadith(s) that justify this doctrine:
Sahih Muslim Hadith (001,0031) Muhammad: “I have been ordered to wage war against mankind until they accept that there is no god but Allah and that they believe I am His prophet and accept all revelations through me.”
The Hadith (the traditions and sayings of Muhammad) is one of the trilogy of sacred doctrinal texts, including the Koran, and the Sira (biography and acts of Muhammad) that constitute together the doctrinal faith and practice of Islam. All Sharia Law is based on these three doctrinal collections. Unlike American Law, Sharia combines religious law with judicial law and controls every aspect of the Muslim life, including family, war, marriage, food, business, dress—virtually everything. Islam means submission to Sharia Law. Sharia is highly problematic for Western civilization because it treats non-Muslims as inferior in human dignity and rights and would replace Constitutional forms of government. Sharia is also famous for its rather cruel punishments for crimes and social violations. Moreover, it is completely incompatible with Christianity, because it views the Christian Trinity as a heresy deserving the death penalty. This is called “Shirk” and is the most serious of all Sharia crimes. Ordinary apostasy or leaving Islam also calls for the death penalty. Even criticism of Muhammad can merit the death penalty.
The Muslim population of the U.S. is now 3.0 million and has doubled since 9/11. The number of mosques has more than doubled to over 3,000, and 80 percent of these are financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, generally through various Muslim Brotherhood front organizations. They preach the Jihadic gospel deeply imbedded in the Koran and teachings of Muhammad. The flow of Muslim permanent residents (Green Card holders) eligible for citizenship has increased to 120,000 per year, while the total including refugees, asylum seekers and temporary student, work, tourist, and other visas has swollen to 250,000 per year. If Hillary Clinton is elected President, she wants to increase Syrian refugees by 500 percent per year. This could push the annual total as high as 350,000, almost double the size of the U.S. Marine Corp. A staggering 90 percent of Middle East refugees are on food stamps, and 76 percent are on Medicaid. Hillary Clinton and President Obama have surely noted that Muslims vote better than six to one for Democrats.
One proposed solution to vetting Muslim immigrants is to prohibit entry of those who would try to impose Sharia over Constitutional and local laws. However, Sharia is an inseparable part of Islam. Even criticism of Sharia can merit the death penalty. A 2015 survey by the Center for Security Policy revealed that 51 percent of American Muslims prefer Sharia to the U.S. Constitution. Sharia compliance is also highly correlated with sympathy for violent Jihad against non-Muslims. Although few Muslims are actually terrorists at any given time, many surveys indicate at least 25 to 30 percent of percent of Muslims are in sympathy with terrorism, Jihad against all unbelievers, and ultimate Islamic Supremacy over the world. These figures run higher in most European countries now and very high in most predominantly Muslim regions.
Surveys of Western countries probably understate, perhaps considerably, the extent of sympathy for terrorism and Sharia because of the Islamic Doctrine of Taqiyya, which encourages Muslims to lie or deceive non-Muslims to advance or defend Islam. Islamic Jihad includes not only war and terrorism but also infiltration, Sharia Finance, and establishing a political fifth column to bring down democratic government. In 2004, the FBI uncovered Muslim Brotherhood plans to impose Sharia and Muslim government on the U.S. by waging “Civilization Jihad” undermining American culture and its supporting institutions.
The Koran calls Muhammad the perfect Muslim 91 times. Yet the Hadith(s) name at least 27 persons who Muhammad had murdered because they were critical of his claim to be a Prophet of Allah. He also had approximately 800 Jewish prisoners of war beheaded because they refused to become Muslims. Moreover, he encouraged the rape of captured women and girls and later sale as sex-slaves. Muhammad desired that Islam be the only religion in Arabia, and it was eventually achieved by genocide and ethnic cleansing. Islam has no Golden Rule, because under Sharia Law and Muhammad’s teachings, non-Muslims are treated harshly, while Muslims are exhorted to love only other Muslims. Muhammad was the inventor of the Jihad style of warfare, which includes treachery, terrorism, looting, and rape. The real Golden Rule of Islam is to follow the example of Muhammad. Knowing Muhammad’s personal history and teachings, should we accept immigrants who aspire to follow his example? Are we that stupid? How many American lives would be lost with such a policy? How long would our freedom and security last?
Hillary Clinton is wrong about Syrian refugees coming to the U.S. having already been vetted for two years. Their vetting was by the United Nations, which is highly partial to the advice of its 57-member Organization for Islamic Cooperation (OIC). That is why 97 percent of the refugees are Sunni Muslims sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood, while the Christians and other minorities are in danger of genocide. The Clintons have accumulated too many millions of dollars from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the Muslim Brotherhood to be trusted with vetting Muslim immigrants.
We all know that there are many Muslims who have only nominal allegiance to the teachings of the Koran and Muhammad. But probably the only Muslims we can safely accept are those who would leave Islam, if they could do so safely. Mere criminal background checks will not tell us that. Based on numerous surveys, my estimate of the level of Muslim immigrant risk is that at least 25 percent of Muslims would be very high risks for violence or subversion. Another 50 percent would blow with the wind of victory and be poor risks for loyal citizenship. Probably less than 25 percent would be acceptable risks. But how sure could we be?—not very. And what is the cost of being wrong?—very high. Under no circumstances should an Obama or Clinton Administration be trusted to vet Muslim immigrants. Their ties to the Muslim Brotherhood are much too strong.