Reports from the U.S. and Europe
The Obama Administration’s priority is evidently to maximize Muslim immigration into the U.S., which over the last several years has averaged over 100,000 per year. The most recent Obama priority has been the forced settlement of Sunni Muslim refugees from Syria into areas like Spartanburg, South Carolina, although local citizens are strongly objecting. In addition to several information and protest rallies, concerned citizens have now filed suit against South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley for her role in establishing the U.S. State Department’s Refugee Resettlement Plan in South Carolina without regard for public safety and the will of the people.
Although more than 10,000 Syrian Christians have been massacred by ISIS forces, over 96 percent of the refugees brought to the U.S. have been Sunni Muslims, disproportionately young males of military service age. The same is true for the refugees now flowing into Germany, Sweden, France, Belgium, and the UK. The number of refugees coming into Germany has exceeded 1.0 million in the last 12 months. There has been a widespread increase in crime and especially sexual assaults as a result, but both the German Government under Chancellor Angela Merkel and the German media have strongly suppressed any negative coverage or public protests concerning the virtual Muslim invasion of Germany. Merkel’s position reflects the European Union (EU) policy of flooding European countries with Muslim immigrants to reduce labor costs and to destroy local cultural loyalties that might breed ethnic resistance to the European Union’s social and cultural engineering goals and economic plans. Shades of this reasoning can also be seen in the Obama Administration’s refugee resettlement plans. Most European Union leaders are thoroughly indoctrinated that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary unfolding right before their eyes.
In the previous parts of this series on Islamic Doctrines, we dispensed with the standard Muslim Brotherhood propaganda proclaimed by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) that Jihad is mainly a spiritual struggle. The word “Jihad” does derive from a basic meaning of struggle, but it is rarely used that way in the three major doctrinal sources (the Koran, the Hadiths, and the Sira) for Islam and Sharia Law. In Sharia Law, “Jihad means war against Kafirs to establish Islam.” Kafirs are unbelievers, infidels, all who reject Muhammad as the prophet of Allah. They are considered the enemies of Allah and include all other religious beliefs and philosophies including especially Christians and Jews, but also secularists, agnostics, and atheists. Jihad is making war in the cause of Allah. Muhammad, who is called the perfect Muslim 91 times in the Koran, considered Jihad the second most important command of Islam, next to the “Shahada,” the proclamation that “There is no god but Allah [and] Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.” Thirty-one percent of the text of Islam’s combined doctrinal trilogy is about Jihad, which is obligatory for all physically able Muslims. Sixty-seven percent of Muhammad’s biography (the Sira) is about Jihad, and the golden rule of Islam is to do as Muhammad did.
In his 2005 book (Slavery, Terrorism, and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat), Peter Hammond, with many years experience in missionary work, described the normal pattern of Islamic Jihad. I have expanded it a bit with knowledge of developments between 2005 and 2016.
It generally starts with Muslim migration to a non-Muslim area.
The first few years, when the Muslim population is only one or two percent, they seem peaceful, but they are beginning to infiltrate key social, cultural, and political power structures.
At 2-3 percent they become more aggressive in proselytizing other minorities and disgruntled groups, especially in prisons.
At 5 percent they become aggressive socially, culturally and politically and seek concessions for different food menus, autonomous Sharia Law governed areas, work rules, clothing and prayer times. They usually become far more influential than their portion of the population would warrant. Government welfare burdens and sexual assault crimes against native females escalate. Sharia Law zones are granted to appease Muslim anger and fabricated discrimination claims. They begin to call for criminalization of “Islamophobia” or any criticism of Islam or immigration. Passing such laws is a deadly handicap to survival of the host country.
At 10 percent of the population, lawlessness increases, and they are inclined to use political protests, open hostility, and actual threats to get their way, including physical violence to anyone who insults Islam or Muhammad. There are riots, car burnings, and escalated crime. Sexual assaults against non-Muslim females become epidemic. The number of “No Go” zones, for police, fire, and medical emergencies explode.
At 20 percent, violent riots erupt and Jihadi militia groups are formed. People are murdered and churches and synagogues are set ablaze.
When the Muslim population reaches 40 percent, there will be civil war at the level experienced in Lebanon, Kosovo, Bosnia, and now sweeping across north-central Africa from Somalia and the Sudan on the east to Nigeria and Mali on the west, with constant terrorist attacks, militia warfare, and massacres. The native population typically begins to emigrate.
At 60 percent, there is uninhibited persecution of non-Muslims and sporadic ethnic cleansing. Sharia Law is implemented for all. Discriminatory taxes (Jizya) of up to 50 percent of assets may be imposed on non-Muslims. There is massive exodus of the remaining non-Muslim population. . .
At 80 percent, Muslims will have complete totalitarian control of the country except for embattled native enclaves. The remaining natives who have not converted to Islam will live in constant fear.
At 100 percent Muslim, the useful idiots of this world will probably still be telling people that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance.
Ingrid Carlqvist, a senior journalist with the Gatestone Institute in New York City, is a native of Sweden. She reports from Sweden that the massive welfare burden borne because of the massive influx of Muslim immigrants in the last few years has resulted in a quarter of a million Swedish retirees living below the EU poverty line. The Swedish government has recently more than doubled its migration budget to $8.6 billion, an increase of almost nine-fold in the ten years since 2006. The Migration Budget is now more than the National Defense Budget, and more than the combined costs of police and justice systems. It is double the child benefits budget. Swedes are already paying the highest taxes in the world.
Carlqvist estimates that Sweden is now in the 10 percent Muslim range, with an estimated 1.0 million Muslims in its population of 9.5 million. She believes Sweden fits very well into the 10 percent mark of Hammond’s Islamic Jihad stage. She says, “People are scared. The number of murders and manslaughters has soared.” But Swedish political leaders will not listen to them. A recent poll indicated 53 percent of Swedes think immigration is the most important issue, up from 27 percent in 2015. Seventy percent feel immigration is too high. Yet according to Carlqvist, almost no one in Sweden is willing to speak out about the obvious relationship between deteriorating public safety, more taxes, looming financial crisis, and the deterioration of Swedish culture with massive Muslim migration.
Meanwhile, most of the politicians of the European Union and the U.S. have a foolish infatuation with multiculturalism and a dangerous misunderstanding of Islam. They do not sense that they are fast-approaching calamity.