First appeared in theTribune Papers in Nov. 5th, 2013.
Here at the Tribune Papers, we feel there is a great injustice unfolding before our eyes. As the details continue to come to light regarding the September 11th terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, the darker the picture becomes. What was first blamed as a random act of violence spurred by a YouTube video, now appears to be much, much more. The Libyan Ambassador feared for his safety long before the attack. The State Department did not relay information of threats. The President knew of things and lied. It is a tangled web of deception to the American people.
Yet the mainstream media is leaving this untouched. Turn on your basic cable or pick up a local paper, and you won’t hear a thing about it. Everyday more and more evidence shows that this Administration mishandled, deceived, and lied about the Benghazi attacks. But these facts would hurt the President’s re-election campaign and it seems in an effort to keep him in office, the media is sweeping these facts under the rug.
Regardless of your political beliefs, the loss of American life on foreign soil and a coverup of the truth of these events should be questioned. It is the duty of the media to bring news to you, regardless of the ramifications. It is that inherit questioning that is the duty of the media. In this important issue, we wanted to bring you as much information as necessary so that you can be informed. Suppression of facts is a danger to our republic.
By Jeffrey T. Kuhner –
The Washington Times
Obama knew: President could have saved American lives — but didn’t
President Obama has been caught in a web of deception that threatens to ensnarl his re-election bid. Multiple emails and diplomatic cables reveal that the administration deliberately deceived the public. Libyagate haunts Mr. Obama, relentlessly eroding his credibility and trustworthiness. It is a stake aimed at the heart of his presidency.
For nearly two weeks, the Obama team claimed the attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi resulted from “spontaneous protests” in response to an anti-Muslim video. That was false — and Mr. Obama knew it. Several senior State Department officials testified at congressional hearings that there were no protests on Sept. 11, 2012. In fact, our diplomatic mission had been quiet all day. Moreover, the State Department was monitoring the compound practically in real time. On video, State Department officials witnessed scores of armed men breach the consulate and begin shooting at our diplomats. The officials’ obvious conclusion: It was a terrorist assault. Within 24 hours, the CIA’s station chief in Libya also reported jihadists had perpetrated the attack.
The latest evidence, however, is a bombshell: Two hours after the assault began, the State Department sent an email to numerous agencies — including the White House Situation Room — that Ansar al-Sharia, a terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda, had claimed responsibility. The email went directly to the White House’s Executive Office — the president’s inner circle. In other words, from nearly the beginning, Mr. Obama knew the Benghazi attack was a terrorist atrocity. Yet he insisted on blaming a phantom protest and an obscure YouTube video. He misled the public in a desperate attempt to cover up his administration’s colossal failure.
Why? The answer is cynical politics. One of Mr. Obama’s central campaign narratives is that he killed Osama bin Laden and badly degraded al Qaeda. The Benghazi attack, however, directly contradicts the administration’s position. Rather than being in retreat, al Qaeda is on the rise. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Mali, Iraq and Libya — the Islamic fascist network has been expanding its safe havens and jihadist activity in every one of these nations.
In particular, Libya has been transformed into a failed Islamist state. Contrary to media spin, Mr. Obama’s military intervention in Libya has been a disaster. Jihadists roam the countryside, targeting minorities and seeking to impose Shariah law. More than 20,000 weapons formerly controlled by late strongman Moammar Gadhafi were stolen by al Qaeda militants. The country’s eastern provinces are nearly in open revolt, fueled by a Muslim insurgency. In fact, the Benghazi attack occurred for one primary reason: Mr. Obama’s war has made Libya safe for radical Islam. Hence, the president feared that the truth about his Libyan intervention would come out. The result is that Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was murdered, along with three other U.S. diplomatic personnel. Mr. Obama has American blood on his hands.
The Sept. 11, 2012, terror plot was not the first one. The administration engaged in willful blindness to the Islamist reality in Benghazi. Our consulate had been attacked in April and June. Britain withdrew its diplomatic mission because of the surging violence. The Red Cross shut down its operations as well. Moreover, American officials repeatedly asked for enhanced security at the compound. The requests were denied. In his diary and several cables, Stevens complained about the growing jihadist violence that threatened his staff — to no avail. They were sacrificed on the altar of Mr. Obama’s multilateral interventionism and political ambitions.
The real tragedy is that perhaps the dead Americans could have been saved. The attack lasted more than six hours. A U.S. drone was directly over the compound, conducting surveillance. American fighter jets and AC-130 gunships were less than 450 miles away. A massive, rapid response should have been ordered to defend the consulate. Instead, Mr. Obama did nothing. The reason: He did not want to violate Libyan “sovereignty” without the permission of the government in Tripoli. He abandoned our personnel to be butchered — like sheep — by rampaging Islamists.
The Benghazi atrocity was not simply an assault on Americans. It was an act of war against America itself. Embassies and consulates are sovereign territory — or at least, they’re supposed to be. When jihadists breached our compound, it was the equivalent of storming a government building in Washington, Boston or New York. They were invading American soil, shedding American blood on behalf of a holy war against the West. Mr. Obama knew it was terrorism, but he refused to order a military response. He systematically perpetrated a cover-up and a manipulation campaign. For this alone, he deserves to be defeated in November. He is unfit to be our president.